Growing Discord community — direct access to the developer, live coverage & picks. Join the Discord Join now →
Tournaments Rankings Matches Predictions ⚡ Get the Sports Addon

Tennis Predictions

Model win probabilities for ATP & WTA matches, with a confidence rating per pick and a public accuracy record over every settled match.

227Upcoming
65.1%Accuracy
13364Settled
Biella, Italy Men Singles clay ✓ Correct Medium · 58%
P. Lagutin
vs
M. Marterer
58%
42%
2–0
Ljubljana, Slovenia clay ✓ Correct Low · 51%
L. Radivojević
vs
N. Basiletti
49%
51%
0–2
Ljubljana, Slovenia clay ✗ Missed High · 66%
P. Hercog
vs
J. Štruplová
66%
34%
0–2
Biella, Italy Men Singles clay ✓ Correct Medium · 62%
A. Marti Pujolras
vs
D. Sakellaridis
62%
38%
2–0
Valencia, Spain clay ✓ Correct Medium · 59%
R. Roura Llaverias
vs
M. Sieg
41%
59%
0–2
Szczecin, Poland clay ✓ Correct High · 67%
M. Vrbensky
vs
K. Wehnelt
33%
67%
0–2
Valencia, Spain clay ✓ Correct Medium · 60%
N. Schunk
vs
D. Jakupović
60%
40%
2–0
Rennes, France hard ✓ Correct Medium · 57%
M. Schönhaus
vs
P. Brady
57%
43%
2–1
Szczecin, Poland clay ✗ Missed Medium · 64%
T. Pereira
vs
R. Molleker
36%
64%
2–1
Caldas da Rainha, Portugal hard ✗ Missed Low · 52%
A. Voloshchuk
vs
A. Arseneault
48%
52%
2–0
Caldas da Rainha, Portugal hard ✓ Correct Medium · 64%
E. Malygina
vs
G. Da Silva-Fick
64%
36%
2–0
Rennes, France hard ✓ Correct Medium · 58%
N. Slavić
vs
Y. Ghazouani Durand
42%
58%
1–2
Guangzhou, China hard ✓ Correct Medium · 65%
A. Binda
vs
K. Ogura
65%
35%
2–1
Biella, Italy Men Singles clay ✗ Missed Low · 51%
J. Martin Manzano
vs
G. Campana Lee
51%
49%
0–2
Biella, Italy Men Singles clay ✗ Missed Medium · 62%
G. La Vela
vs
F. Iannaccone
38%
62%
2–1
Guangzhou, China hard ✓ Correct High · 70%
M. W. K. Leong
vs
H. Liu
70%
30%
1–1
Ljubljana, Slovenia clay ✓ Correct High · 69%
R. Zelníčková
vs
K. Najzer
69%
31%
2–0
Ljubljana, Slovenia clay ✓ Correct High · 69%
M. Colmegna
vs
G. Price
69%
31%
2–0
Biella, Italy Men Singles clay ✗ Missed Low · 52%
I. Almazan Valiente
vs
G. Ferrari
48%
52%
2–0
Guangzhou, China hard ✓ Correct Low · 51%
N. Honda
vs
J. Flores
51%
49%
2–0
Guangzhou, China hard ✓ Correct Medium · 57%
T. Huang
vs
Y. Kikuchi
43%
57%
0–2
Ljubljana, Slovenia clay ✓ Correct Low · 50%
L. Bošković
vs
R. Serban
50%
50%
2–1
Phan Thiet 4, Vietnam hard ✗ Missed Medium · 61%
M. Imamura
vs
E. Aguiard
61%
39%
0–2
Phan Thiet 4, Vietnam hard ✗ Missed Medium · 58%
T. Derepasko
vs
T. Ichikawa
42%
58%
2–0
Phan Thiet 4, Vietnam hard ✓ Correct Low · 55%
T. Yamanaka
vs
R. Matsuda
45%
55%
0–2
Phan Thiet 4, Vietnam hard ✓ Correct Medium · 60%
M. Bouzige
vs
K. Miyoshi
40%
60%
0–2
Phan Thiet 4, Vietnam hard ✓ Correct High · 73%
R. Pacheco Mendez
vs
S. Callejon Hernando
73%
27%
2–0
Phan Thiet 4, Vietnam hard ✓ Correct Medium · 58%
M. Borisiouk
vs
D. Kim
58%
42%
2–0
Phan Thiet 4, Vietnam hard ✓ Correct Medium · 63%
F. Peliwo
vs
S. Ziegann
63%
37%
2–0
Phan Thiet 4, Vietnam hard ✓ Correct Medium · 55%
S D P. Dev
vs
H. Heck
45%
55%
0–2
⚡ This page, via API Pro

Everything on this page is available as JSON via the Tennis API (Sports Addon, $5/mo):

GET /tennis/api/v2/predictions/?upcoming=true
Tennis API docs →

How to read this: the bar shows our model's win probability for each player; the confidence pill rates how much signal the model had for this match-up. Accuracy is measured over every settled prediction — not a curated subset. Not betting advice; no outcome is guaranteed.