Growing Discord community — direct access to the developer, live coverage & picks. Join the Discord Join now →
Tournaments Rankings Matches Predictions ⚡ Get the Sports Addon

Tennis Predictions

Model win probabilities for ATP & WTA matches, with a confidence rating per pick and a public accuracy record over every settled match.

206Upcoming
64.3%Accuracy
10183Settled
ATP Challenger Liege, Belgium Men Singles clay ✗ Missed Medium · 56%
M. Chazal
vs
E. Demanet
56%
44%
0–2
ATP Challenger Nottingham 3, Great Britain Men Singles grass ✗ Missed Low · 52%
I. Ivanov
vs
D. Dinev
48%
52%
2–1
ATP Challenger Liege, Belgium Men Singles clay ✓ Correct Medium · 57%
M. Damas
vs
H. Huens
57%
43%
2–0
ATP Challenger Nottingham 3, Great Britain Men Singles grass ✓ Correct Medium · 61%
C. Chidekh
vs
M. Janvier
61%
39%
2–1
Trieste, Italy clay ✗ Missed Medium · 64%
F. Roncadelli
vs
M. Ribecai
64%
36%
0–2
Iasi, Romania clay ✓ Correct Medium · 56%
A. Donski
vs
J. Čižek
56%
44%
2–0
Wimbledon, Women grass ✗ Missed Low · 55%
J. Paolini
vs
A. Eala
45%
55%
2–1
Contrexeville, France clay ✓ Correct High · 69%
A. Blinkova
vs
E. Andreeva
69%
31%
2–0
ATP Challenger Nottingham 3, Great Britain Men Singles grass ✓ Correct Medium · 63%
A. Vales
vs
M. Zhu
63%
37%
2–0
ATP Challenger Liege, Belgium Men Singles clay ✓ Correct Medium · 57%
K. Wehnelt
vs
M. Van der Meerschen
57%
43%
2–0
Iasi, Romania clay ✓ Correct Medium · 58%
O. Wallin
vs
M. Neuchrist
58%
42%
2–0
Bastad, Sweden clay ✓ Correct High · 74%
E. Arango
vs
L. Nilsson
74%
26%
2–0
Wimbledon, Men grass ✗ Missed High · 82%
A. de Minaur
vs
F. Cobolli
82%
18%
0–3
Braunschweig, Germany clay ✓ Correct Medium · 56%
J. Opitz
vs
M. Petković
44%
56%
0–2
ATP Challenger Nottingham 3, Great Britain Men Singles grass ✗ Missed Medium · 57%
F. Bass
vs
H. Hoeyeraal
57%
43%
0–2
Wimbledon, Women grass ✓ Correct Medium · 61%
M. Bouzkova
vs
E. Mertens
39%
61%
0–2
Iasi, Romania clay ✓ Correct Medium · 56%
D. Poljak
vs
S. H. Haita
44%
56%
0–2
Bastad, Sweden clay ✓ Correct High · 77%
M. Matoula
vs
Y. Putintseva
23%
77%
0–2
Contrexeville, France clay ✓ Correct Medium · 62%
J. Grabher
vs
R. Masarova
38%
62%
1–2
ATP Challenger Liege, Belgium Men Singles clay ✗ Missed Medium · 56%
T. Huang
vs
S. Purtseladze
44%
56%
2–1
Braunschweig, Germany clay ✓ Correct High · 73%
D. Kuzmanov
vs
R. Strombachs
73%
27%
2–0
Braunschweig, Germany clay ✓ Correct Low · 50%
A. Chepelev
vs
D. Yevseyev
50%
50%
2–1
Contrexeville, France clay ✓ Correct Medium · 60%
A. Hesse
vs
B. Palicova
60%
40%
2–0
Bastad, Sweden clay ✗ Missed Medium · 57%
L. Romero Gormaz
vs
D. Semenistaja
43%
57%
2–1
Trieste, Italy clay ✗ Missed Low · 55%
A. Martin
vs
H. Bernet
55%
45%
0–2
ATP Challenger Liege, Belgium Men Singles clay ✓ Correct Low · 54%
L. Raquillet
vs
F. Ribero
54%
46%
2–1
Iasi, Romania clay ✓ Correct High · 86%
M. Erhard
vs
N. K. Sinha
86%
14%
2–0
Iasi, Romania clay ✗ Missed Low · 51%
M. Zormann
vs
S D P. Dev
51%
49%
0–2
Contrexeville, France clay ✓ Correct Low · 51%
A. Lew Yan Foon
vs
D. Martynov
49%
51%
1–2
Iasi, Romania clay ✗ Missed High · 78%
A. Marti Pujolras
vs
S. Hamza Reguig
78%
22%
1–2
⚡ This page, via API Pro

Everything on this page is available as JSON via the Tennis API (Sports Addon, $5/mo):

GET /tennis/api/v2/predictions/?upcoming=true
Tennis API docs →

How to read this: the bar shows our model's win probability for each player; the confidence pill rates how much signal the model had for this match-up. Accuracy is measured over every settled prediction — not a curated subset. Not betting advice; no outcome is guaranteed.