← All tennis
Set by set
| Player | Set 1 | Set 2 | Sets |
|---|---|---|---|
| M. Mecarelli | 6 | 6 | 2 |
| E. Vasa | 3 | 2 | 0 |
Match facts
Tournament
Todi, Italy
Category
Challenger
Round
Qualification Round 1
Surface
clay
Court
Grandstand
City
Todi
First serve
M. Mecarelli
Total games
12–5
Recent form
M. Mecarelli · match stats · E. Vasa
1Aces1
1Double faults2
60%First serve in60%
71%First-serve points won63%
96%Second serve in88%
57%Second-serve points won38%
67%Break points saved0%
100%Break points converted33%
48%Return points won34%
38Service points won21
19Receiver points won20
57Total points won41
12Games won5
8Service games won4
0Tiebreaks won0
6Longest point streak8
5Longest game streak2
Per set · aces & double faults
| Set | Aces | Double faults |
|---|---|---|
| Set 1 | 1–1 | 1–1 |
| Set 2 | 0–0 | 0–1 |
Figures read M. Mecarelli first.
Set 230 min · 8 games · newest first
5-2
game 8
M. Mecarelli serving
15-0
30-0
5-2
game 7
E. Vasa serving
BREAK
0-15
15-15
30-15
30-30
40-30
4-2
game 6
M. Mecarelli serving
0-15
15-15
30-15
40-15
3-2
game 5
E. Vasa serving
BREAK
15-0
30-0
40-0
2-2
game 4
M. Mecarelli serving
15-0
30-0
40-0
40-15
1-2
game 3
E. Vasa serving
0-15
0-30
0-40
1-1
game 2
M. Mecarelli serving
BREAK
15-0
15-15
15-30
15-40
1-0
game 1
E. Vasa serving
BREAK
15-0
15-15
30-15
30-30
40-30
Set 141 min · 9 games · newest first
6-3
game 9
M. Mecarelli serving
15-0
15-15
30-15
30-30
40-30
40-40
40-A
40-40
A-40
5-3
game 8
E. Vasa serving
0-15
0-30
0-40
5-2
game 7
M. Mecarelli serving
15-0
30-0
30-15
40-15
40-30
40-40
A-40
4-2
game 6
E. Vasa serving
0-15
0-30
0-40
15-40
30-40
4-1
game 5
M. Mecarelli serving
0-15
15-15
30-15
40-15
3-1
game 4
E. Vasa serving
BREAK
15-0
30-0
30-15
40-15
2-1
game 3
M. Mecarelli serving
0-15
15-15
30-15
30-30
30-40
40-40
A-40
40-40
A-40
1-1
game 2
E. Vasa serving
0-15
15-15
15-30
15-40
1-0
game 1
M. Mecarelli serving
15-0
15-15
15-30
30-30
40-30
Point chips read M. Mecarelli first · highlighted border marks the point winner.
Win probability
M. MecarelliE. Vasa
71%
Model confidence
Why the model thinks so
- Better ranking (+34 places)
- Dominant on this surface (56% win rate)
- More effective serve
- Better recent form
How the model did
Predicted E. Vasa
— wrong