← All tennis
Set by set
| Player | Set 1 | Set 2 | Sets |
|---|---|---|---|
| L. Poling | 2 | 2 | 0 |
| S. Suh | 6 | 6 | 2 |
Match facts
Tournament
UTR PTT Newport Beach Women 21
Category
Utr
Surface
hard
Court
The Tennis Club at Newport Beach - Court 12
City
Newport Beach
First serve
S. Suh
Total games
4–12
L. Poling · match stats · S. Suh
1Aces0
4Double faults0
49%First serve in63%
52%First-serve points won63%
85%Second serve in100%
42%Second-serve points won67%
38%Break points saved75%
25%Break points converted63%
35%Return points won53%
24Service points won31
17Receiver points won27
41Total points won58
4Games won12
3Service games won7
0Tiebreaks won0
9Longest point streak9
2Longest game streak5
Per set · aces & double faults
| Set | Aces | Double faults |
|---|---|---|
| Set 1 | 1–0 | 1–0 |
| Set 2 | 0–0 | 3–0 |
Figures read L. Poling first.
Set 245 min · 8 games · newest first
2-5
game 8
L. Poling serving
0-15
0-30
0-40
15-40
2-5
game 7
S. Suh serving
0-15
0-30
0-40
2-4
game 6
L. Poling serving
BREAK
15-0
15-15
15-30
30-30
40-30
40-40
40-A
40-40
A-40
40-40
40-A
40-40
40-A
2-3
game 5
S. Suh serving
BREAK
15-0
30-0
40-0
1-3
game 4
L. Poling serving
15-0
30-0
40-0
0-3
game 3
S. Suh serving
0-15
15-15
30-15
40-15
40-30
40-40
40-A
40-40
A-40
40-40
40-A
0-2
game 2
L. Poling serving
BREAK
0-15
15-15
30-15
30-30
30-40
0-1
game 1
S. Suh serving
0-15
15-15
15-30
15-40
Set 139 min · 8 games · newest first
2-6
game 8
L. Poling serving
BREAK
0-15
15-15
15-30
15-40
2-5
game 7
S. Suh serving
0-15
15-15
15-30
15-40
2-4
game 6
L. Poling serving
15-0
30-0
30-15
40-15
40-30
1-4
game 5
S. Suh serving
15-0
15-15
15-30
15-40
30-40
1-3
game 4
L. Poling serving
15-0
15-15
30-15
40-15
0-3
game 3
S. Suh serving
15-0
15-15
30-15
30-30
30-40
0-2
game 2
L. Poling serving
BREAK
15-0
15-15
30-15
30-30
30-40
0-1
game 1
S. Suh serving
15-0
15-15
15-30
30-30
30-40
Point chips read L. Poling first · highlighted border marks the point winner.
Win probability
L. PolingS. Suh
63%
Model confidence
Why the model thinks so
- Better recent form
How the model did
Predicted L. Poling
— wrong