← All tennis
Set by set
| Player | Set 1 | Set 2 | Sets |
|---|---|---|---|
| E. Ruse | 6 | 6 | 2 |
| L. Tagger | 4 | 2 | 0 |
Match facts
Tournament
Beijing
Category
Wta1000
Round
Round of 128
Surface
hard
Court
Moon Court
City
Beijing
First serve
L. Tagger
Total games
12–6
E. Ruse · match stats · L. Tagger
1Aces2
1Double faults1
77%First serve in84%
66%First-serve points won51%
92%Second serve in90%
50%Second-serve points won20%
60%Break points saved38%
63%Break points converted40%
54%Return points won38%
33Service points won28
32Receiver points won19
65Total points won47
12Games won6
7Service games won4
0Tiebreaks won0
7Longest point streak4
5Longest game streak2
Per set · aces & double faults
| Set | Aces | Double faults |
|---|---|---|
| Set 1 | 0–1 | 1–0 |
| Set 2 | 1–1 | 0–1 |
Figures read E. Ruse first.
Set 234 min · 8 games · newest first
5-2
game 8
E. Ruse serving
15-0
30-0
40-0
5-2
game 7
L. Tagger serving
0-15
15-15
15-30
30-30
40-30
40-40
40-A
5-1
game 6
E. Ruse serving
15-0
30-0
40-0
40-15
4-1
game 5
L. Tagger serving
BREAK
15-0
15-15
15-30
30-30
40-30
3-1
game 4
E. Ruse serving
15-0
30-0
40-0
40-15
40-30
2-1
game 3
L. Tagger serving
BREAK
0-15
15-15
30-15
40-15
1-1
game 2
E. Ruse serving
15-0
30-0
30-15
40-15
0-1
game 1
L. Tagger serving
0-15
15-15
30-15
30-30
40-30
40-40
40-A
Set 149 min · 10 games · newest first
6-4
game 10
E. Ruse serving
0-15
0-30
0-40
15-40
30-40
40-40
A-40
5-4
game 9
L. Tagger serving
BREAK
15-0
15-15
30-15
40-15
4-4
game 8
E. Ruse serving
BREAK
0-15
0-30
15-30
30-30
30-40
4-3
game 7
L. Tagger serving
0-15
15-15
15-30
30-30
30-40
4-2
game 6
E. Ruse serving
0-15
15-15
30-15
40-15
3-2
game 5
L. Tagger serving
BREAK
15-0
15-15
30-15
30-30
40-30
2-2
game 4
E. Ruse serving
15-0
15-15
15-30
30-30
40-30
40-40
A-40
1-2
game 3
L. Tagger serving
15-0
15-15
15-30
30-30
30-40
40-40
40-A
1-1
game 2
E. Ruse serving
BREAK
0-15
15-15
15-30
15-40
1-0
game 1
L. Tagger serving
BREAK
0-15
15-15
30-15
30-30
40-30
40-40
A-40
Point chips read E. Ruse first · highlighted border marks the point winner.
Win probability
E. RuseL. Tagger
59%
Model confidence
Why the model thinks so
- Better on break points
How the model did
Predicted E. Ruse
— correct
E. Ruse
1.91
consensus price, since opening
L. Tagger
1.91
consensus price, since opening
Match winnerdecimal
Bookmaker
E. Ruse
L. Tagger
Gamdom
2.01
1.81
Consensus
1.91
1.91