← All tennis
Set by set
| Player | Set 1 | Set 2 | Sets |
|---|---|---|---|
| M. Semedo | 3 | 1 | 0 |
| J. de Jager | 6 | 6 | 2 |
Match facts
Tournament
UTR PTT Carvoeiro Men +H 07
Category
Utr
Round
Final
Surface
hard
Court
Carvoeiro Clube de Tenis - 05. Court FredGil
City
Carvoeiro
First serve
M. Semedo
Total games
4–12
Recent form
M. Semedo · match stats · J. de Jager
0Aces2
1Double faults1
58%First serve in72%
52%First-serve points won79%
94%Second serve in92%
44%Second-serve points won69%
0%Break points saved100%
0%Break points converted100%
23%Return points won51%
21Service points won36
11Receiver points won22
32Total points won58
4Games won12
4Service games won8
0Tiebreaks won0
5Longest point streak9
1Longest game streak5
Per set · aces & double faults
| Set | Aces | Double faults |
|---|---|---|
| Set 1 | 0–0 | 1–0 |
| Set 2 | 0–2 | 0–1 |
Figures read M. Semedo first.
Set 232 min · 7 games · newest first
1-5
game 7
J. de Jager serving
0-15
0-30
0-40
1-5
game 6
M. Semedo serving
BREAK
15-0
15-15
30-15
30-30
30-40
1-4
game 5
J. de Jager serving
0-15
0-30
0-40
15-40
1-3
game 4
M. Semedo serving
BREAK
0-15
0-30
0-40
1-2
game 3
J. de Jager serving
15-0
15-15
30-15
40-15
40-30
40-40
40-A
40-40
40-A
40-40
40-A
1-1
game 2
M. Semedo serving
15-0
30-0
40-0
0-1
game 1
J. de Jager serving
0-15
0-30
0-40
Set 136 min · 9 games · newest first
3-6
game 9
M. Semedo serving
BREAK
15-0
15-15
15-30
15-40
3-5
game 8
J. de Jager serving
15-0
15-15
15-30
30-30
30-40
40-40
40-A
3-4
game 7
M. Semedo serving
15-0
30-0
40-0
40-15
2-4
game 6
J. de Jager serving
0-15
0-30
0-40
2-3
game 5
M. Semedo serving
15-0
15-15
15-30
30-30
40-30
40-40
A-40
1-3
game 4
J. de Jager serving
15-0
15-15
15-30
30-30
30-40
1-2
game 3
M. Semedo serving
BREAK
0-15
0-30
15-30
15-40
1-1
game 2
J. de Jager serving
0-15
0-30
0-40
1-0
game 1
M. Semedo serving
0-15
15-15
30-15
30-30
40-30
Point chips read M. Semedo first · highlighted border marks the point winner.
Head to head
Win probability
M. SemedoJ. de Jager
55%
Model confidence
Why the model thinks so
- Slight statistical edge
How the model did
Predicted J. de Jager
— correct