← All tennis
Set by set
| Player | Set 1 | Set 2 | Sets |
|---|---|---|---|
| D. Guzmicky | 1 | 2 | 0 |
| T. Paroulek | 6 | 6 | 2 |
Match facts
Tournament
UTR PTT Trnava Men 05
Category
Utr
Surface
hard
Court
TC Empire Trnava - Court 4
City
Trnava
First serve
T. Paroulek
Total games
3–12
Recent form
D. Guzmicky · match stats · T. Paroulek
2Aces3
7Double faults1
50%First serve in71%
73%First-serve points won89%
68%Second serve in91%
27%Second-serve points won73%
43%Break points saved%
%Break points converted57%
16%Return points won50%
22Service points won32
6Receiver points won22
28Total points won54
3Games won12
3Service games won8
0Tiebreaks won0
4Longest point streak8
1Longest game streak5
Per set · aces & double faults
| Set | Aces | Double faults |
|---|---|---|
| Set 1 | 2–0 | 3–1 |
| Set 2 | 0–3 | 4–0 |
Figures read D. Guzmicky first.
Set 230 min · 8 games · newest first
2-5
game 8
T. Paroulek serving
0-15
0-30
0-40
2-5
game 7
D. Guzmicky serving
BREAK
0-15
0-30
15-30
15-40
30-40
2-4
game 6
T. Paroulek serving
0-15
0-30
0-40
2-3
game 5
D. Guzmicky serving
0-15
0-30
15-30
30-30
40-30
1-3
game 4
T. Paroulek serving
0-15
15-15
15-30
30-30
30-40
1-2
game 3
D. Guzmicky serving
BREAK
15-0
15-15
15-30
15-40
30-40
1-1
game 2
T. Paroulek serving
0-15
15-15
15-30
15-40
1-0
game 1
D. Guzmicky serving
0-15
15-15
30-15
40-15
Set 127 min · 7 games · newest first
1-6
game 7
T. Paroulek serving
0-15
0-30
0-40
1-5
game 6
D. Guzmicky serving
BREAK
15-0
15-15
15-30
15-40
1-4
game 5
T. Paroulek serving
0-15
0-30
0-40
15-40
1-3
game 4
D. Guzmicky serving
BREAK
0-15
0-30
15-30
30-30
40-30
40-40
A-40
40-40
40-A
40-40
40-A
1-2
game 3
T. Paroulek serving
0-15
0-30
0-40
1-1
game 2
D. Guzmicky serving
15-0
30-0
40-0
0-1
game 1
T. Paroulek serving
0-15
15-15
15-30
15-40
30-40
Point chips read D. Guzmicky first · highlighted border marks the point winner.
Win probability
D. GuzmickyT. Paroulek
60%
Model confidence
Why the model thinks so
- Dominant on this surface (50% win rate)
- More effective serve
- Better recent form
- Better on break points
How the model did
Predicted T. Paroulek
— correct