Ranking trend
best #440Career record
30 matches11–19
Win–loss
29%
Hard · 4–10
44%
Clay · 7–9
—
Grass · 0–0
2025
40 matches · 14–26 · 35.0%| Surface | M | W | Titles | Aces | DF | 1st serve | BP conv. | Winners | UE | TB |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hardcourt Indoor | 4 | 0 | — | 8 | 6 | 64% | 39% | — | — | — |
| Hardcourt Outdoor | 10 | 3 | — | 11 | 27 | 61% | 38% | — | — | 0–1 |
| Red Clay | 26 | 11 | — | 30 | 65 | 62% | 30% | — | — | 0–4 |
2024
63 matches · 37–26 · 58.7%| Surface | M | W | Titles | Aces | DF | 1st serve | BP conv. | Winners | UE | TB |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grass | 7 | 4 | — | 29 | 21 | 72% | 46% | 32 | 21 | 1–6 |
| Hardcourt Indoor | 7 | 4 | — | 25 | 13 | 67% | 44% | — | — | 0–5 |
| Hardcourt Outdoor | 21 | 12 | — | 53 | 67 | 65% | 41% | 15 | 44 | 4–3 |
| Red Clay | 28 | 17 | — | 41 | 90 | 66% | 42% | — | — | 7–5 |
2023
25 matches · 13–12 · 52.0%| Surface | M | W | Titles | Aces | DF | 1st serve | BP conv. | Winners | UE | TB |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grass | 4 | 3 | — | 8 | 12 | 72% | 40% | 11 | 36 | 3–0 |
| Hardcourt Indoor | 3 | 1 | — | 16 | 3 | 67% | 33% | — | — | 0–2 |
| Hardcourt Outdoor | 10 | 4 | — | 26 | 32 | 63% | 40% | 20 | 47 | 2–1 |
| Red Clay | 8 | 5 | — | 9 | 20 | 64% | 40% | 67 | 61 | 0–2 |
M = matches · W = wins · DF = double faults · BP conv. = break points converted · UE = unforced errors · TB = tiebreaks won–lost.
FT
Istanbul II, Turkey
hard
1
6
4
6
0
2
FT
Samsun, Turkiye
hard
1
6
7
6
4
6
1
2
FT
Samsun, Turkiye
hard
6
3
6
4
2
0
FT
Iasi, Romania
clay
6
2
1
6
4
6
1
2
FT
Brasov, Romania
clay
1
6
4
6
0
2
FT
Brasov, Romania
clay
6
2
7
6
2
0
FT
Brasov, Romania
clay
7
6
6
3
2
0
FT
ATP Challenger Targu Mures, Romania Men Singles
clay
6
3
6
7
6
7
1
2
FT
ATP Challenger Chisinau, Moldova Men Singles
clay
2
6
6
4
2
6
1
2
FT
ATP Challenger Chisinau, Moldova Men Singles
clay
5
7
6
7
0
2
FT
ATP Challenger Chisinau, Moldova Men Singles
clay
1
6
6
1
6
4
2
1
FT
ATP Challenger Chisinau, Moldova Men Singles
clay
6
3
0
0
1
0
FT
Manama, Bahrain
hard
1
6
4
6
0
2
FT
Alicante, Spain
hard
6
4
6
3
2
0
FT
Grodzisk Mazowiecki, Poland
hard
6
3
6
4
2
0
FT
Grodzisk Mazowiecki, Poland
hard
6
0
7
6
2
0
FT
Grodzisk Mazowiecki, Poland
hard
6
2
6
4
2
0
FT
Porto, Portugal
hard
0
6
3
6
0
2
FT
Kitzbuhel
clay
6
3
6
4
2
0
FT
Kitzbuhel
clay
2
6
7
6
6
3
2
1