← All tennis
Set by set
| Player | Set 1 | Set 2 | Sets |
|---|---|---|---|
| M. Kasnikowski | 2 | 2 | 0 |
| O. Virtanen | 6 | 6 | 2 |
Match facts
Tournament
Tampere, Finland
Category
Challenger
Round
Semifinals
Surface
clay
Court
Centre Court
City
Tampere
First serve
M. Kasnikowski
Total games
4–12
Recent form
M. Kasnikowski · match stats · O. Virtanen
0Aces5
0Double faults1
73%First serve in56%
58%First-serve points won81%
100%Second serve in95%
33%Second-serve points won62%
56%Break points saved100%
0%Break points converted44%
27%Return points won49%
23Service points won35
11Receiver points won22
34Total points won57
4Games won12
4Service games won8
0Tiebreaks won0
3Longest point streak9
1Longest game streak5
Per set · aces & double faults
| Set | Aces | Double faults |
|---|---|---|
| Set 1 | 0–4 | 0–0 |
| Set 2 | 0–1 | 0–0 |
Figures read M. Kasnikowski first.
Set 232 min · 8 games · newest first
2-5
game 8
O. Virtanen serving
0-15
0-30
0-40
15-40
30-40
2-5
game 7
M. Kasnikowski serving
15-0
15-15
30-15
40-15
1-5
game 6
O. Virtanen serving
15-0
15-15
15-30
15-40
1-4
game 5
M. Kasnikowski serving
0-15
15-15
30-15
30-30
40-30
0-4
game 4
O. Virtanen serving
0-15
15-15
15-30
15-40
0-3
game 3
M. Kasnikowski serving
BREAK
0-15
0-30
0-40
15-40
0-2
game 2
O. Virtanen serving
15-0
15-15
15-30
30-30
40-30
40-40
40-A
40-40
40-A
40-40
40-A
0-1
game 1
M. Kasnikowski serving
BREAK
0-15
0-30
0-40
15-40
30-40
Set 125 min · 8 games · newest first
2-6
game 8
O. Virtanen serving
15-0
15-15
30-15
30-30
30-40
2-5
game 7
M. Kasnikowski serving
0-15
15-15
30-15
40-15
40-30
1-5
game 6
O. Virtanen serving
0-15
0-30
15-30
15-40
1-4
game 5
M. Kasnikowski serving
BREAK
0-15
0-30
0-40
15-40
30-40
1-3
game 4
O. Virtanen serving
0-15
0-30
0-40
1-2
game 3
M. Kasnikowski serving
BREAK
15-0
15-15
15-30
30-30
30-40
1-1
game 2
O. Virtanen serving
0-15
15-15
15-30
15-40
1-0
game 1
M. Kasnikowski serving
15-0
30-0
40-0
40-15
Point chips read M. Kasnikowski first · highlighted border marks the point winner.
Win probability
M. KasnikowskiO. Virtanen
68%
Model confidence
Why the model thinks so
- Ranked far higher (+122 places)
- Dominant on this surface (43% win rate)
- More effective serve
- Better on break points